and now, cried Max, LET THE WILD RUMPUS START

invokethedope.tumblr.com (for original things)
susiethemoderator:

nya-kin:

"For me it’s kind of like the white girl going hood."

Still salty that she passes for a light skinned black girl.
#FixItJesus

susiethemoderator:

nya-kin:

"For me it’s kind of like the white girl going hood."

Still salty that she passes for a light skinned black girl.

#FixItJesus

(via tvjojo)

LOL that has nothing to do with those boring ass pink people we are just trying to memorize every tiny bit of beyonce’s crazy in love remix

LOL that has nothing to do with those boring ass pink people we are just trying to memorize every tiny bit of beyonce’s crazy in love remix

fogo-av:

afrosandprose:

alexandraelle:

Thanks for my mug @keturahariel! 😍

Okay, I’m sorry, I just can’t get with this. 
This mug is depicting a black woman wearing a war bonnet/Native American headdress. I tried to look up background information about the artist to see if she has Native American ancestry/is Native American, but her website is currently down. But, based on the phrase, “Make art, not war,” it seems as if the war bonnet is placed flippantly in the image to make it a cute, marketable image, rather than to give homage to Native American culture. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Anyway, I’ve looked through a lot of the reblogs/notes on this image, and from what I’ve seen, absolutely NO ONE talks about how this is/could qualify as cultural appropriation. We can all get behind how the Bass Coast Festival Banned Native American Headdresses and get angry when white people run around music festivals with headdresses on, etc., but I tend to find a trend on Tumblr of ignoring when a black person or artist does something that could qualify as cultural appropriation.
I’ve seen SO MANY black girls wearing bindis reblogged on here with barely anyone being like, “Wait a minute…” I’ve seen images of Pharrell and Kid Cudi in headdresses reblogged for “fashion.” Blah blah blah.
I just get really frustrated and think it’s critical for us to not only call out cultural appropriation when white people do it, but when EVERYONE does it. I think it’s important that we hold ourselves accountable. Yes, we are all POC, but that doesn’t mean that we don’t make mistakes and can encroach on another person’s culture, etc.
Again, I’m not sure of the background of the artist, but I’m more ranting about the principle of it. I just think we need to stop ignoring these types of things and be like, “YO, I don’t know that you should be selling art depicting people wearing Native American headdress/war bonnets on it if that’s not a part of your culture. If it’s not a part of your culture, you’re definitely profiting off of someone else’s culture, and that’s a problem,” you know?
you all get what I mean. ok, goodbye.

^^ this is so important. People always feel that POCs are somehow exempt from being criticized and called out on cultural appropriation. Now, we mustn’t forget that there are black indigenous peoples of the Americas but we can’t tell who the person is on the cup.
Even if it turns out that the artist is Native American, or that the person depicted (who reads as a woman) is Native American, the point is still valid especially in terms of authenticity.
Furthermore, This mug says make art not war, but has what reads as a war bonnet… Does this mean the artist is mis representing warbonnets as art and not ceremoniously earned war and leadership bonnets? Idk. This is supper triggering because we have to remember that not all indigenous peoples have the same type of headdress or warbonnets but for a culture that is in danger in part by appropriation, artists must be specific and explicit as to why and whom they are representing…
But maybe as a non Native American I should stay in my lane…

fogo-av:

afrosandprose:

alexandraelle:

Thanks for my mug @keturahariel! 😍

Okay, I’m sorry, I just can’t get with this. 

This mug is depicting a black woman wearing a war bonnet/Native American headdress. I tried to look up background information about the artist to see if she has Native American ancestry/is Native American, but her website is currently down. But, based on the phrase, “Make art, not war,” it seems as if the war bonnet is placed flippantly in the image to make it a cute, marketable image, rather than to give homage to Native American culture. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

Anyway, I’ve looked through a lot of the reblogs/notes on this image, and from what I’ve seen, absolutely NO ONE talks about how this is/could qualify as cultural appropriation. We can all get behind how the Bass Coast Festival Banned Native American Headdresses and get angry when white people run around music festivals with headdresses on, etc., but I tend to find a trend on Tumblr of ignoring when a black person or artist does something that could qualify as cultural appropriation.

I’ve seen SO MANY black girls wearing bindis reblogged on here with barely anyone being like, “Wait a minute…” I’ve seen images of Pharrell and Kid Cudi in headdresses reblogged for “fashion.” Blah blah blah.

I just get really frustrated and think it’s critical for us to not only call out cultural appropriation when white people do it, but when EVERYONE does it. I think it’s important that we hold ourselves accountable. Yes, we are all POC, but that doesn’t mean that we don’t make mistakes and can encroach on another person’s culture, etc.

Again, I’m not sure of the background of the artist, but I’m more ranting about the principle of it. I just think we need to stop ignoring these types of things and be like, “YO, I don’t know that you should be selling art depicting people wearing Native American headdress/war bonnets on it if that’s not a part of your culture. If it’s not a part of your culture, you’re definitely profiting off of someone else’s culture, and that’s a problem,” you know?

you all get what I mean. ok, goodbye.

^^ this is so important. People always feel that POCs are somehow exempt from being criticized and called out on cultural appropriation. Now, we mustn’t forget that there are black indigenous peoples of the Americas but we can’t tell who the person is on the cup.

Even if it turns out that the artist is Native American, or that the person depicted (who reads as a woman) is Native American, the point is still valid especially in terms of authenticity.

Furthermore,
This mug says make art not war, but has what reads as a war bonnet… Does this mean the artist is mis representing warbonnets as art and not ceremoniously earned war and leadership bonnets? Idk. This is supper triggering because we have to remember that not all indigenous peoples have the same type of headdress or warbonnets but for a culture that is in danger in part by appropriation, artists must be specific and explicit as to why and whom they are representing…

But maybe as a non Native American I should stay in my lane…

(via afrosandprose)

gummo1997:

Me: fun and chill, also relatable
you: James from twin peaks

(via makomori)

Anonymous asked: do you believe in israels right to exist? some argue that they haven't committed anything hamas hasn't and it isn't fair to blame a whole state for the errors of a terrorist organization :/

ladybrun:

I’m not dipping my hands in debate about whether israel is justified. Not this time. After this ground invasion during Ramadan and killing children on eid.

I no longer want to debate about the war on Palestinian. It’s not fare to make a population facing genocide seem like a complicated debatable issue.

It’s simple. It’s one sided warfare against civilians.

Anyone who needs convincing of israels wrongs, who can’t deduce it from the images of destruction and death in Gaza, is a monster.

uninhibitedandunrepentant:

kamen-rider-rahbito:

meezdeez7:

knightofsuperior:

josukehigashikata:

fashinpirate:

im hollerin

Miyazaki: The Problem With The Anime Industry Is It’s Full of People Who Actually Buy the Content They Consume

 #I’M REALLY TORN ABOUT THIS #I LOVE MIYAZAKI AND THE THINGS HE MAKES #BUT NOW I FEEL COMPLETELY INSULTED BY A PERSON I LOOK UP TO #ALSO HE IMPLIES MASTURBATION IS AS BAD AS WAR????? #WTF MIYAZAKI WHO ARE YOU #I HATE SEEING THE PERSON BEHIND THE CREATIONS SOMETIMES #THIS IS HORRIBLE AND I WISH I DIDN’T SEE IT #IT’S JUST LIKE HORRIBLESUBS AND THE SHITTY THINGS THEY SAY ABOUT THE FANS WHO WATCH THE SHOWS THEY FANSUB #JFC FUCK THE WORLD 
Methinks Miyazaki has spent a little too much time going bar hopping with Hideki Anno

He’s the new Alan Moore. Was only a matter of time.

IN WHICH I WRITE A VERY LONG POST ABOUT WHY MIYAZAKI IS NOT WRONG AND I APPARENTLY CAN’T INSERT A READ MORE BREAK SO SUCK IT IN THAT REGARD TOO, I GUESS
tl;dr:
If you unironically call yourself an otaku, you’re lumping yourself in with some of the least-respected members of society in Japan, and you shouldn’t be surprised/outraged when a well-respected member of Japanese society looks down on you.
The things otaku like are off-putting, and because the anime industry makes most of their money from otaku, the anime industry in general is off-putting.
The anime industry should probably be restructured so that otaku have less power to decide what gets animated, otherwise the anime industry will collapse because NOBODY LIKES IT.
Gimme your lunch money, nerds.
Uh, he never implied masturbation is as bad as war. He’s being a cranky old man, as cranky old men are wont to do. The author of the article just listed those things as additional things Miyazaki doesn’t like.
And something you people really, really, REALLY need to understand is that "otaku" is not a term of endearment in Japan the way “nerd” has become so in the West. If I were to speculate, I’d say it has a lot to do with cultural values - here, we place a lot of value and pride in our individual identities, but that just is not the case in Japan. They, and the East Asian countries in general, place a lot of value in working to improve the collective. Being an otaku implies a lot of the things you’d think being the classical “nerd” implies - living in your mother’s basement, spending all your time watching anime/slacking off, and being a general drain on society. While that’s not “accepted” in the West per se, it is not directly contradictory to every cultural value we have. We’re just expressing our identities when we do those kinds of things. In Japan, they are the antithesis of a praiseworthy member of society.When the anime industry is, in Miyazaki’s mind, full of these kinds of people, who seal themselves off in insular groups and jack off to 2D waifus all day in between drawing said 2D waifus, that is a real problem.
Frankly, when I look at the entire catalogue of anime titles released over the past 5 years, I see what he means. Who the fuck is going to buy OreImo except lolicon siscon hentai otaku? Who the fuck is going to buy K-On! except ronery NEETs? I LOVE the Monogatari Series - but who the fuck is going to buy that shit except social rejects? 
Real-life people do not act like the people in those shows.Real people do not say to their friends/rivals in love “hey, let’s take a shower together while I fondle your tits.” Real sisters do not fall in love with their oniichan desu~s after many sessions of counseling. I love the tsundere archetype, but a real-life tsundere is someone that nobody wants to be around because they treat other people like shit.
I probably should devote an entire paragraph to lolis. (Most) people do not sexualize little girls, and in fact find the sexualization of of little girls to be repulsive. Why, then, are there so many lolis in anime? Because lolis represent a lot of things that a lot of men find desirable in women - innocence, petite bodies, cuteness in general. But for whatever reason, it has become not only okay, but the norm for anime to have prepubescent girls in compromising sexual positions. If you like flat chests - fine. If you like inexperienced girls - fine. If you like cute things - fine. Mashing all of those things together on a 12-year-old and slapping a bikini on her to appeal to otaku with those preferences? Most people will say that is fucked up. 
Fanservice is off-putting to a lot of people. Incest is off-putting to a lot of people. Lolis are off-putting to a lot of people. Unbelievable characters and character interactions are off-putting to a lot of people. But those things are things that self-proclaimed otaku audiences embrace, so that’s what the Miyazaki-proclaimed otaku in the industry draw. Because animation studios make so little money off of anything but DVD and merchandise sales, and otaku are the only people who buy that stuff, the anime industry of late has become inbred and stale at best, and offensive and pedophilic at worst.
Miyazaki is well-loved, both in the West and in the East. But he is not well-loved because his works are made for otaku. I’ve never seen anything he’s made, but the sense I get is that he’s loved in the mainstream because he tells stories that resonate with a hell of a lot of people. The problem he sees in the anime industry is that their works tend only to resonate with otaku, and otaku are not acceptable members of society in Japan. From what I’ve seen of what’s been released and been popular the past few years, I cannot blame him for thinking the way he does.

Just to be clear, the ‘otaku’ he is referring to is what we call ‘BRONIES’. As in get mad the show is not for them, draw porn, etc etc bronies.

LOLing at how the person posted a well-said and v long description and then the next person was just like ‘BRONIES’ and in my head i could hear the whole western world going “ohhhhhhhhh yeah like bronies, got it”

uninhibitedandunrepentant:

kamen-rider-rahbito:

meezdeez7:

knightofsuperior:

josukehigashikata:

fashinpirate:

im hollerin

Miyazaki: The Problem With The Anime Industry Is It’s Full of People Who Actually Buy the Content They Consume

 #I’M REALLY TORN ABOUT THIS #I LOVE MIYAZAKI AND THE THINGS HE MAKES #BUT NOW I FEEL COMPLETELY INSULTED BY A PERSON I LOOK UP TO #ALSO HE IMPLIES MASTURBATION IS AS BAD AS WAR????? #WTF MIYAZAKI WHO ARE YOU #I HATE SEEING THE PERSON BEHIND THE CREATIONS SOMETIMES #THIS IS HORRIBLE AND I WISH I DIDN’T SEE IT #IT’S JUST LIKE HORRIBLESUBS AND THE SHITTY THINGS THEY SAY ABOUT THE FANS WHO WATCH THE SHOWS THEY FANSUB #JFC FUCK THE WORLD 

Methinks Miyazaki has spent a little too much time going bar hopping with Hideki Anno

He’s the new Alan Moore. Was only a matter of time.

IN WHICH I WRITE A VERY LONG POST ABOUT WHY MIYAZAKI IS NOT WRONG AND I APPARENTLY CAN’T INSERT A READ MORE BREAK SO SUCK IT IN THAT REGARD TOO, I GUESS

tl;dr:

  • If you unironically call yourself an otaku, you’re lumping yourself in with some of the least-respected members of society in Japan, and you shouldn’t be surprised/outraged when a well-respected member of Japanese society looks down on you.
  • The things otaku like are off-putting, and because the anime industry makes most of their money from otaku, the anime industry in general is off-putting.
  • The anime industry should probably be restructured so that otaku have less power to decide what gets animated, otherwise the anime industry will collapse because NOBODY LIKES IT.
  • Gimme your lunch money, nerds.

Uh, he never implied masturbation is as bad as war. He’s being a cranky old man, as cranky old men are wont to do. The author of the article just listed those things as additional things Miyazaki doesn’t like.

And something you people really, really, REALLY need to understand is that "otaku" is not a term of endearment in Japan the way “nerd” has become so in the West. If I were to speculate, I’d say it has a lot to do with cultural values - here, we place a lot of value and pride in our individual identities, but that just is not the case in Japan. They, and the East Asian countries in general, place a lot of value in working to improve the collective. Being an otaku implies a lot of the things you’d think being the classical “nerd” implies - living in your mother’s basement, spending all your time watching anime/slacking off, and being a general drain on society. While that’s not “accepted” in the West per se, it is not directly contradictory to every cultural value we have. We’re just expressing our identities when we do those kinds of things. In Japan, they are the antithesis of a praiseworthy member of society.When the anime industry is, in Miyazaki’s mind, full of these kinds of people, who seal themselves off in insular groups and jack off to 2D waifus all day in between drawing said 2D waifus, that is a real problem.

Frankly, when I look at the entire catalogue of anime titles released over the past 5 years, I see what he means. Who the fuck is going to buy OreImo except lolicon siscon hentai otaku? Who the fuck is going to buy K-On! except ronery NEETs? I LOVE the Monogatari Series - but who the fuck is going to buy that shit except social rejects? 

Real-life people do not act like the people in those shows.Real people do not say to their friends/rivals in love “hey, let’s take a shower together while I fondle your tits.” Real sisters do not fall in love with their oniichan desu~s after many sessions of counseling. I love the tsundere archetype, but a real-life tsundere is someone that nobody wants to be around because they treat other people like shit.

I probably should devote an entire paragraph to lolis. (Most) people do not sexualize little girls, and in fact find the sexualization of of little girls to be repulsive. Why, then, are there so many lolis in anime? Because lolis represent a lot of things that a lot of men find desirable in women - innocence, petite bodies, cuteness in general. But for whatever reason, it has become not only okay, but the norm for anime to have prepubescent girls in compromising sexual positions. If you like flat chests - fine. If you like inexperienced girls - fine. If you like cute things - fine. Mashing all of those things together on a 12-year-old and slapping a bikini on her to appeal to otaku with those preferences? Most people will say that is fucked up. 

Fanservice is off-putting to a lot of people. Incest is off-putting to a lot of people. Lolis are off-putting to a lot of people. Unbelievable characters and character interactions are off-putting to a lot of people. But those things are things that self-proclaimed otaku audiences embrace, so that’s what the Miyazaki-proclaimed otaku in the industry draw. Because animation studios make so little money off of anything but DVD and merchandise sales, and otaku are the only people who buy that stuff, the anime industry of late has become inbred and stale at best, and offensive and pedophilic at worst.

Miyazaki is well-loved, both in the West and in the East. But he is not well-loved because his works are made for otaku. I’ve never seen anything he’s made, but the sense I get is that he’s loved in the mainstream because he tells stories that resonate with a hell of a lot of people. The problem he sees in the anime industry is that their works tend only to resonate with otaku, and otaku are not acceptable members of society in Japan. From what I’ve seen of what’s been released and been popular the past few years, I cannot blame him for thinking the way he does.

Just to be clear, the ‘otaku’ he is referring to is what we call ‘BRONIES’. As in get mad the show is not for them, draw porn, etc etc bronies.

LOLing at how the person posted a well-said and v long description and then the next person was just like ‘BRONIES’ and in my head i could hear the whole western world going “ohhhhhhhhh yeah like bronies, got it”

(Source: arabellesicardi, via cryingmanlytears)